The Baha'i faith (Bahaism)

Unveiling the Truth: Behind the Public Image of Bahaism (the Baha'i faith)

Translate

What happened to Shoghi Effendi’s vast properties in Iran after his death?

Shoghi Effendi's Death and a Looming Crisis

The death of Shoghi Effendi, the Guardian of the Baha'i Faith, in London in 1957 plunged his community into a crisis of unprecedented scale. His passing created two critical and intertwined problems that threatened the very structure of the faith. The first was a leadership vacuum; Effendi died without a will and, being childless, had appointed no successor as Guardian. The second was a financial emergency of immense proportions, centered on his vast personal property holdings in Iran, which were valued at an estimated $287 million USD at the time. This confluence of a succession crisis and a colossal fortune set the stage for a dramatic and ethically fraught chapter in Baha'i history. This essay will critically examine the controversial and legally dubious methods employed by the post-Shoghi Baha'i leadership to secure this fortune, a campaign of deception that culminated in the creation of the Umana Company.

The Heirs' Dilemma: Doctrinal Purity vs. Financial Reality

To understand the extraordinary measures taken by the Baha'i leadership, one must first grasp the strategic conflict between their religious doctrine and the unyielding realities of Iranian civil law. This clash presented a central dilemma that forced the leadership into a series of decisions that compromised their publicly stated principles and set a precedent for future clandestine actions.

The fundamental conflict arose immediately after Shoghi’s death. According to Baha'i belief, as established by his predecessor Abdu'l-Bahá, the property of the Guardian should pass directly to the next Guardian to be used in service of the faith. However, the legal reality in Iran was starkly different. Without a will or children, Shoghi’s legal heirs were his wife, Ruhiyyih Maxwell, and his surviving brothers and sisters.

This situation was steeped in a deep and well-documented hypocrisy. Years earlier, Shoghi Effendi had excommunicated all of his siblings for various reasons, including their demand for a share of Abdu'l-Bahá's inheritance, an act he condemned as a profound betrayal of the faith! Now, facing the total loss of the assets to these same relatives, the Baha'i leadership was forced into a humiliating reversal. They entered into negotiations with the very individuals they had long branded as heretics and outcasts. In a move that flagrantly contradicted Shoghi's own decrees, the leadership paid a "significant percentage" of his vast fortune to his siblings. This payment was a necessary bribe to secure their cooperation in obtaining the certificate of inheritance required by Iranian law.

This expedient betrayal of principle, however, did not go unnoticed within the community. For many "free-thinking Baha'is", the deal was an unacceptable moral compromise. It raised troubling questions: if the siblings were truly heretics, why was the leadership now enriching them in direct violation of the Guardian’s wishes? This act of realpolitik created a tangible crisis of faith, revealing that the leadership's hypocrisy was not just a theoretical contradiction but a tangible problem causing dissent among its followers in Iran. This short-term, compromising deal, however, merely secured the assets from immediate dispersal; it necessitated a more permanent and surreptitious solution to consolidate complete control.

The Umana Company: A Corporate Veil for an Illicit Takeover

The Umana Company (Shirkat-i Umana) was not a legitimate business enterprise; it was a deliberately crafted legal instrument designed to execute a fraudulent takeover of Shoghi Effendi's assets, circumvent Iranian tax authorities, and permanently disinherit the legal heirs. It was the centerpiece of a sophisticated conspiracy orchestrated by the most senior figures in the Iranian Baha'i community, the details of which were laid bare in a formal complaint filed on May 17, 1969 (27/2/1348), with the Prosecutor General of Iran's Supreme Court.

The complaint's author was Colonel Yadu'llah Thabet Rasekh, a figure whose background gave his accusations immense credibility. Rasekh was a retired military officer with a legal education, born into a Baha'i family and a devout follower for decades. Crucially, he was also an investor whose own personal funds were later seized by the Umana Company after he left the Baha'i faith. His detailed grievance was thus not an external attack, but an insider's meticulously documented exposé of a crime. According to Rasekh, the key individuals who masterminded this plan included:

  • Dr. Ali-Muhammad Varqa
  • Dhikru'llah Khadem
  • Shua'ullah 'Ala'i
  • 'Ali-Akbar Furutan
  • Habib Thabet (Pasal)
  • Hadi Rahmani Shirazi

The mechanics of their scheme, as outlined in Rasekh's legal filings, unfolded in a clear, step-by-step sequence of fraud:

  1. Illegal Initial Transfer: Before any legal inheritance process was completed, the conspirators used fraudulent deeds of settlement, specifically numbers 47308, 47434, and 47948, all registered at the Tehran Notary Office 25, to illegally transfer all of Shoghi's assets to one of their own, Dr. Ali-Muhammad Varqa.
  2. Creation of Shirkat-i Umana: The key individuals then formally established the Umana Company as a joint-stock corporation.
  3. Second Fraudulent Transfer: Dr. Varqa, now the illicit holder of the entire estate, promptly transferred all the properties to the newly created Umana Company.
  4. Massive Tax Evasion: The core of the financial fraud lay in a brazen act of misrepresentation. To obscure the true value of the assets being transferred and evade taxes, the company's capital was declared at a laughably minuscule fraction of its real worth.

The Umana Company was, in essence, a holding company. Its primary function was to manage, subdivide, and sell off the vast portfolio of real estate it now illegally controlled. This corporate structure was meticulously designed to systematically evade a staggering amount of taxes—including inheritance taxes, transfer taxes, income taxes, and registration fees—estimated to be as high as thirteen million USD. This operation was not merely a circumvention of religious protocol; it was a calculated, large-scale criminal enterprise, a fact that exposes the profound ethical and religious betrayals it represented.

A Betrayal of Faith and Public Trust

The actions of the Baha'i leadership in the Umana Company affair represent a direct and staggering violation of the principles of honesty, trustworthiness, and obedience to spiritual authority that they publicly espoused. The entire operation was a betrayal not only of Iranian law but, more significantly, of Shoghi Effendi's own stated intentions for the properties.

In his historical work Kitab-i-Qarn-i-Badi', v. 4, page 49, Shoghi Effendi had explicitly declared that these properties were "public endowments" belonging to the entire global Baha'i community. They were not the personal property of a select few leaders to be manipulated for financial or administrative convenience. The creation of the Umana Company privatized these communal assets, placing them under the absolute control of a small, self-appointed cabal.

This affair powerfully illustrates how the pursuit of financial control led the leadership to disregard the explicit instructions of both Abdu'l-Bahá and Shoghi Effendi. They negotiated with and enriched individuals they themselves had branded as covenant-breakers, and they engaged in a criminal conspiracy that shattered the faith's public image of integrity, according to Rasekh. The illegality of their actions was clear and multifaceted. As Colonel Rasekh’s complaint underscores, the property transfers were executed in direct violation of multiple laws, statutes and legal opinions.

By knowingly breaking these laws, the leadership demonstrated a profound contempt for the civic duty they preached to their followers. This affair shattered any pretense of moral or legal integrity among the Baha'i leadership of that era, exposing a deep chasm between their spiritual claims and their worldly actions.

Total Pageviews

Popular Posts (last 30 days)

Popular Posts (all time)

Blog Archive