 |
| Shoghi Effendi & Ruhi Afnan |
Introduction: The Story History Tried to Forget
Official histories, like polished monuments, tend to commemorate victories while sanding away the rough edges of human complexity. Within every major religious movement, alongside the celebrated narrative, lie silenced voices and forgotten stories. It is a rare and startling occasion when one of those voices finds its way back from the quiet archives of the past, demanding to be heard.
This is the story of one such voice, captured in a long-lost, unsent letter from 1970. The author was Ruhi Afnan—a man uniquely positioned at the very heart of the Baha'i Faith's leadership. He was the grandson of ‘Abdu’l-Bahá, the son of one of its most revered figures, and, most critically, the first cousin and former secretary to Shoghi Effendi, the man appointed Guardian of the Baha'i Faith.
After decades of silent exile from the community, Afnan was moved to write after reading The Priceless Pearl, the official biography of Shoghi Effendi penned by his widow, Ruhiyyih Rabbani. Afnan’s letter is a direct, passionate, and often painful rebuttal. It breaks his silence not to attack the faith he loved, but to defend it from what he saw as a devastating distortion. It presents a profoundly different perspective on the faith's history, its leaders, and its core principles—one that replaces myth with tragic humanity. What follows are five shocking revelations from a man who was there, challenging the very foundations of the official record.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Revelation 1: The 'Great Betrayal' Was a Tragic Family Feud
In The Priceless Pearl, Ruhiyyih Rabbani portrays the expulsion of ‘Abdu’l-Bahá’s family members as a continuation of a historic pattern of theological betrayal known as "Covenant-breaking." It’s a narrative of spiritual warfare, where disloyalty to the Guardian is equated with disloyalty to God.
Writing as an insider, Ruhi Afnan dismantles this grand spiritual narrative, revealing that the reasons for these excommunications were often shockingly personal and rooted in complex family dynamics rather than theological rebellion. He outlines the true causes behind the expulsions of his mother and aunts—the daughters of ‘Abdu’l-Bahá:
- Touba Khanum (Afnan's mother): Her supposed sin was not faithlessness but maternal love. Expelled for refusing to shun her own son, Ruhi, after he was cast out, her enduring loyalty to the Cause was proven by her constant advice to him: "since I could not be of any service inside the Cause, I should not be the source of any harm or discord out of it."
- Rouha Khanum (Afnan's aunt): She was cast out for attempting to uphold the explicit wish of ‘Abdu’l-Bahá that Shoghi Effendi marry her daughter. Shoghi Effendi, however, preferred Mary Maxwell (the future Ruhiyyih Rabbani), and Rouha Khanum's adherence to her father’s will was reframed as opposition.
- Zia Khanum (Shoghi Effendi's own mother): She was never formally cast out by her son. Instead, she felt compelled to leave his house because she could not tolerate being "insulted and demeaned" by his wife, Ruhiyyih Rabbani. When she later sought to return, Rabbani issued an ultimatum to Shoghi Effendi: "if your mother returns I leave." He chose his wife.
- Monawar Khanum (Afnan's aunt): Her transgression was simple compassion. She was expelled merely for receiving her sister, Zia Khanum, with warmth and affection during her failed attempt at reconciliation.
These intimate accounts of family friction stand in stark contrast to the official portrayal of a spiritual rot spreading through the family tree. Rabbani wrote:
"The Covenant-breaking inside the family of Baha’u’llah was like a vine, it en-twined the tree and strangled it. Wherever its tendrils reached out it plucked up what it wound itself about and destroyed that too." (p. 122)
Afnan's testimony replaces this image of a sinister, strangling vine with a portrait of deeply human pain. The tragedy is amplified by his revelation that Shoghi Effendi kept a special suitcase filled with the unanswered letters and petitions from these same expelled family members—a private archive of their anguish and his own, a potent symbol of voices silenced by decree.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Revelation 2: The Guardian Was a Fallible 'Mirror,' Not an Infallible God
At the core of Ruhi Afnan’s letter is a powerful theological argument that directly refutes the concept of the Guardian’s "bestowed infallibility," a central theme in The Priceless Pearl. For Afnan, this was not just theological hair-splitting; it was a fundamental corruption of Baha'u'llah's core message.
He presents a clear, guiding analogy derived directly from the Baha'i founder's writings:
- The Prophets, specifically the Báb and Baháʼu'lláh, are the "Suns of Reality." They are the original, divine sources of revelation—the light itself.
- The appointed leaders who follow, such as the Guardians and administrative bodies, are "moons" or "mirrors." Their sole function is to reflect the light of the Sun. They are not the source of that light.
- As "mirrors," these leaders are part of the created world. They are therefore fallible and capable of error. Their authority, Afnan insists, is entirely conditional on their ability to faithfully and purely reflect the teachings of the "Sun."
This perspective is a direct challenge to the "sovereign" and "infallible" leader Rabbani describes:
"The Master’s grandson had been sublimed by the forces released in His Tes-tament into the Guardian of the Faith; belonging to the sovereign caste of his divine Forefathers, he was himself a sovereign. To the primacy conferred by ties of consanguinity had been added the powers of infallible guidance with which the operation of God’s Covenant had invested him." (p. 436)
Afnan argues this claim is profoundly dangerous. By elevating the human "mirror" to the station of the divine "Sun," it creates what he calls a "third reality" between the Creator and the created. This, he states, is antithetical to Baha'i theology and dangerously similar to the clergy-based structures in other religions—an institution Baháʼu'lláh himself rejected.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Revelation 3: True Faith Demands Questioning, Not Blind Obedience
This distinction between a divine 'Sun' and a fallible 'mirror' isn't just an abstract concept; Afnan argues it is the very foundation of a Baha'i's relationship with God—a foundation he believed Rabbani was actively dismantling with her demands for absolute obedience.
He contends that the single most important duty for a Baha'i is the recognition of, and faith in, the "Sun of Reality"—the Prophet. To make membership conditional on anything else, especially unquestioning obedience to human institutions or individual "mirrors," is to reduce the universal, divine message of Baháʼu'lláh to a mere "party or a community," subject to human error. He directly confronts Ruhiyyih Rabbani's position on this matter, quoting her from The Priceless Pearl:
"Faith and obedience are the most important factors in one’s relations to God, to his Manifestation and to the Head of the Faith. One must believe even if one does not see, and even if one does not believe, one must obey." (p. 122)
Afnan’s refutation is absolute. He asserts that obedience is only required when the "mirrors"—the Guardian and the institutions—act in perfect conformity with the words of the "Sun." To demand obedience over personal belief and conscience is a perversion of the divine order. To follow such a command, he concludes, is to "follow sin and sinners," not "the source of all good." For Afnan, true devotion is a conscious act of faith, not blind submission.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Revelation 4: The Guardian's Line Was Intentionally SeveredPerhaps the most explosive claim in Ruhi Afnan’s letter is his assertion that Ruhiyyih Rabbani was personally and knowingly responsible for the termination of the line of Guardians—a central institution of the Baha'i Faith. In her book, Rabbani suggests this outcome was part of a divine plan, writing:
"...They wanted a second Abdul Baha... But God seems to have had another idea."
Afnan counters this with a devastating, firsthand account, framing the end of the Guardianship not as God's will, but as the result of human ambition. He lays out the chain of events:
- The will of ‘Abdu’l-Bahá explicitly stated that the Guardianship should pass from Shoghi Effendi to his progeny. Securing an heir was therefore a primary duty.
- Afnan states that several people, including a family friend and nurse named Mrs. Edma Balloura Belmont, knew before the marriage that Mary Maxwell (the future Ruhiyyih Rabbani) was medically unable to have children.
- He claims Rabbani was aware of this fact but concealed it to secure her marriage to the Guardian.
This is a critical point where Afnan's testimony moves from interpretation to direct accusation. He does not paraphrase or soften the blow, stating plainly:
"...for the sake of position and power she said nothing about it and proceeded with the marriage and succeeded in bringing the line to an end. A sin greater that this was inconceivable."
In Afnan’s telling, the end of the hereditary Guardianship was not a mysterious act of God, but a preventable human tragedy rooted in a devastating choice.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Revelation 5: The 'Flawless Sovereign' Was a Man Tormented by Regret
While The Priceless Pearl portrays Shoghi Effendi as a sovereign leader vested with infallible authority, Ruhi Afnan’s letter reveals a far more complex and human figure. Drawing on his intimate perspective as cousin and secretary, he paints a picture of a man crushed by the weight of his responsibilities and haunted by a pivotal mistake.
Afnan points to the immense pressure Shoghi Effendi felt after being unexpectedly named Guardian, quoting his own words from a 1924 letter to illustrate this inner torment:
"my prolonged absence, my utter inaction, should not, however, be solely attributed to certain external manifestations of inharmony (sic), of discontent and disloyalty – however paralysing their effect has been upon the continuance of my work – but also to my own unworthiness and to my imperfections and frailties."
The source includes a crucial note that the Persian text is even stronger: "[In the Persian text it reads ‘I do not see myself as worthy of this position and do not consider myself as capable of carrying out these duties.’]"
Afnan locates the source of this anguish in Shoghi Effendi's fateful decision to study at Oxford. He reveals the full, tragic context:
- The trip was undertaken against the explicit wishes of his aging grandfather, ‘Abdu’l-Bahá, who wanted to "personally familiarise and train him" for the succession. The decision caused ‘Abdu’l-Bahá "heartbreak."
- When ‘Abdu’l-Bahá died unexpectedly, Shoghi Effendi was abroad. This absence, Afnan asserts, was the very source of the "paralysis" in the Cause that he later lamented. It was a decision that became a source of his own profound and lasting regret, causing him to "shed tears of regret and remorse over it."
This portrait of a young man struggling with "unworthiness" and grappling with a lifelong wound offers a far more tragic and relatable figure than the one of "infallible guidance" presented in the official biography.
Source : Ruhi Afnan’s 1970 letter to the Spiritual Assembly of Iran
https://abdulbahasfamily.org/touba-khanum/ruhi-afnan/
Posts
