The hoops Haifan Baha'is jump through to try to say Baha'u'llah created the concept of the UHJ



Bahá’u’lláh conferred authority upon the Universal House of Justice to exert a positive influence on the welfare of humankind, to promote education, peace and global prosperity, and to safeguard human honour and the position of religion.

https://universalhouseofjustice.bahai.org/

Where does Baha'u'llah say this? In the Kitab i Aqdas, where Baha'u'llah writes about the "House of Justice" (not "Universal House of Justice"), and says the House of Justice is something to be built "in every city", and never describes any kind of global religious institution? Oh, but Abdul Baha "interpreted" Baha'u'llah's writings, which never refer to a UHJ, to refer to a UHJ, using his "infallible interpretive authority" which Baha'u'llah never gave him, but which he has because reasons, so we must ignore what Baha'u'llah's writings say and go with Abdul Baha's "infallible interpretation".

Imagine if Baha'is had not believed in this lie of the UHJ. Imagine if Baha'is had built local Houses of Justice, as Bahaullah intended. Imagine if every local Baha'i community had its own identity, instead of every single one unanimously revolving around the Institute Process.

The Baha'i Leadership's Role in the Displacement of Palestinians



The Baha'i community's actions in relation to land acquisitions and dealings with the Israeli government paint a picture of questionable practices, often driven by opportunism and a willingness to negotiate with forces that have historically oppressed and displaced Palestinian people. What follows is an unflinching examination of the Baha’i leadership’s actions concerning land dealings, the sale of Palestinian villages, and the purchasing of Palestinian, Arab and Muslim properties from the Israeli government, all of which exposes the community’s ethical standing.

1. Sale of Palestinian Villages to Zionists

In the 1920s, Shoghi Effendi, took part in selling entire Palestinian villages - specifically, the villages of al-Nuqayb and al-Samra - to the Jewish National Fund (JNF). These lands were owned by the Baha'is but had originally been inhabited by Palestinian Arabs. Shoghi Effendi's decision to sell these lands to the JNF, a Zionist organization, enabled the expansion of Jewish settlements and further entrenched the displacement of Palestinians. The eventual depopulation of the village of al-Samra in 1948 following the sale epitomizes the destructive consequences of these transactions. The Baha'i leadership thus played a pivotal role in facilitating the very forces that would later lead to the Nakba (the Palestinian exodus). This sale was not just an economic transaction; it was an act that compounded the suffering of displaced Palestinians.

2. Purchase of the Mansion of Bahji from the Israeli Government

The acquisition of the Mansion of Bahji, along with its surrounding lands, occurred after the original Arab owners fled during the 1948 Arab-Israeli War. The land was later obtained by Shoghi Effendi through an exchange with the Israeli government. While the Baha'i leadership frames this acquisition as necessary for preserving the faith’s holy sites, the fact remains that it was made possible only by exploiting the flight of Palestinian Arabs. This exchange not only benefited the Baha'i Faith but also served as yet another instance of the Israeli government capitalizing on the land vacated by Palestinians.

3. The Case of Mazra'ih

Mazra'ih, a Muslim religious endowment (waqf), was sold to the Baha'is under controversial circumstances. Despite waqf properties being legally protected from sale under Islamic law, the Israeli Minister of Religions, Rabbi Maimon, intervened to allow the Baha'is to take control of Mazra'ih, effectively violating Islamic law. This land, originally held by Palestinian Muslims, was appropriated with direct assistance from the Israeli government. The acquisition of Mazra'ih, a Waqf property of Muslims, was not merely an administrative transaction - it was an example of religious and nationalistic manipulation for the benefit of the Baha'i community, furthering Israel’s goal of consolidating control over Palestinian land.

4. Exchanges with the Israeli Military

There is also evidence of the Baha'i leadership engaging in land exchanges with the Israeli military. One notable transaction involved the property that was initially held by the British War Office and later transferred to the Carmelites. This property was ultimately transferred to Shoghi Effendi’s name in a deal involving the Israeli Defense Ministry. Such dealings reflect the Baha'i leadership’s complicity in negotiating with military authorities whose actions have historically been associated with the subjugation of Palestinians. These exchanges were not merely bureaucratic; they were strategic, ensuring the Baha'i community’s continued safety and protection in Palestine at the expense of displaced Palestinians.

5. Using Demolished Palestinian Homes for Shrines

One of the most disturbing aspects of the Baha'i community’s dealings in Israel relates to the use of ceramic tiles taken from demolished Palestinian homes, primarily in Yafo (Jaffa). These tiles were used in the construction around the Shrines of Baha'u'llah and the Bab. By collecting and hauling away remnants of Palestinian homes, the Baha'is not only benefitted from the destruction of Palestinian properties but actively engaged in the symbolic erasure of Palestinian history and culture. The act of using these tiles to decorate their shrines illustrates an insensitivity to the trauma of Palestinians whose homes were destroyed, and whose lives were upended by the expansion of Zionist settlements.

6. Buying Lands owned by "Covenant-Breakers"

The Baha’i community also engaged in buying land that had once been owned by individuals labeled as "covenant-breakers" - those who had fallen out of favor with the Baha’i leadership. Many of these individuals were either displaced or had their lands appropriated by the Israeli government after fleeing the newly established state. Shoghi Effendi’s decision to purchase land from the Israeli government, which had taken control of such properties, highlights the opportunistic nature of these acquisitions. This was not merely a religious dispute within the Baha'i community; it was a matter of exploiting the situation in a post-1948 Palestine, where the Israeli government controlled vast swaths of Palestinian land.

7. Purification of the Haram-i-Aqdas

Another contentious action was the exhumation and reburial of Diya'u'llah, the younger brother of Abdul Baha, from the Haram-i-Aqdas near the Shrine of Baha'u'llah in Bahji. The Baha'is justified this act as a necessary "purification" of the sacred site, which had been tainted by the presence of those they considered covenant-breakers. This operation, which included expropriation orders from the Israeli government, involved the removal of remains and the expulsion of individuals associated with the early Baha’i schisms. It was a harsh, legalistic cleansing, carried out with the complicity of Israeli authorities, which further entrenched the Baha’i community’s ties to the Israeli state.

8. Negotiation for the Temple Site on Mount Carmel

The land where the Baha'i Temple will come in the future on Mount Carmel was initially coveted by the British military but later transferred to the Israeli Defense Ministry. The Baha'i leadership successfully negotiated with Israeli authorities to secure this land for their holy site. This further solidified the Baha'i community’s relationship with the Israeli military and government, ensuring their position in a region that had seen the violent displacement of its Palestinian population. By obtaining land originally sought after by foreign powers and later secured by Israel, the Baha'is once again benefitted from the dispossession of Palestinians.

9. The Zikrullah Property

Finally, the Baha’i community's exchange of land near Galilee (Zikrullah property) for land near the Shrine of Baha'u'llah from the Israeli government again highlights their active engagement in land transactions with Israel. The Zikrullah property, located near the border of Syria and within a demilitarized zone, was an area of interest for the Israeli government, which pressured the Zikrullah family to sell. The Baha’is, however, negotiated a trade for land that had been expropriated from Palestinians, thus further enriching the Baha'i community at the expense of the Palestinian people.

A History of Opportunism and Complicity

The Baha'i community's dealings with the Israeli government are a deeply troubling aspect of their history. From selling Palestinian villages to purchasing land taken from displaced Palestinians, from exploiting demolished Palestinian homes to negotiating with military authorities, the Baha'i leadership’s actions consistently reveal a pattern of opportunism and complicity in the dispossession of Palestinian land. Rather than standing in solidarity with the oppressed, the Baha'is chose to align themselves with the very forces responsible for the displacement and suffering of millions of Palestinians. These actions expose the darker side of the Baha'i Faith’s relationship with Israel and its role in the ongoing injustice faced by the Palestinian people.

Sources:
https://books.google.com/books/about/All_That_Remains.html?id=_By7AAAAIAAJ&redir_esc=y
https://bahai-library.com/writings/shoghieffendi/mbw/sec-25.html
https://bahai.works/index.php?title=File%3ABaha%27i_News_244.pdf&page=4
http://bahai-covenant.blogspot.com/2010/05/leroy-ioas-champion-charters.html
Earl Redman, Shoghi Effendi - Through the Pilgrim's Eye Vol. 2
https://www.grbooks.com/products/shoghi-effendi-vol-2-through-pilgrims-eye_redman?variant=24525720191076
http://bahai-library.com/uhj_messages_1963-86_full&chapter=3
Leroy Ioas - Hand of the Cause of God by Anita Ioas Chapman

Bahá'ís are complicit in genocide


This will be uncomfortable for many Bahá’ís... especially those with truly good hearts. But neutrality and silence in the face of injustice support tyranny. Of all people, Bahá’ís should know this.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cde3eyzdr63o

In what kind of world can one preach justice and claim to stand for truth, while remaining silent about the slaughter of children just a few miles away? Shame on those who defend such hypocrisy.

There are many kind-hearted Bahá’ís who feel a deep unease about this... and they should. That discomfort is not weakness. It is your conscience. It is reason, trying to speak the truth.

You cannot, on one hand, denounce the atrocities in Iran, and on the other, turn away from genocide unfolding right before your eyes. That contradiction is not neutrality. It is hypocrisy. And those who numb the hearts of the kind and the compassionate should be ashamed.

Singing 'Kumbaya' in circles, quoting scripture, and exchanging emails from within ivory towers, while children are being butchered outside your door , is this what truth looks like?

If you claim to belong to the 'Holy Land', then the suffering in that land is your problem too. Just as you speak out for justice in Iran, in Ukraine, or anywhere else , you must speak out here as well. Anything less is complicity.

Bahá’ís are fortunate, most of the world barely knows who they are. They live safely in a comfortable bubble, untouched by scrutiny. But never before has the world been so united in its moral outrage and those who speak of 'unity' day and night are choosing, willfully, to remain outside of it.

Go test it for yourself. I dare you to bring up this issue with your Local Spiritual Assembly. Watch the reactions. Witness the hypocrisy.

Here is a heroine , one of your own, who stood up for justice. And what became of her? She was cast out. Banished from your circle. Thrown out of the very community she tried to hold accountable.....

Baha'is converting children of other religions through Baha'i Children Classes. Here is the proof.

Baháʼu'lláh is introduced to children through these songs primarily as the Prophet of God for today and the Promised One of all ages, who brought a message of unity, justice, and love for all mankind, despite enduring great suffering.

Here are some short examples from the songs:

  • The Promised One and Glory of God: Songs directly identify him as "Bahá’u’lláh, the Glory of God" and "The Promised One of All the Ages". For example, "Sing a new song, the Promised One has come / Sing a new song, Bahá’u’lláh has come".
  • Bringer of a New Day and Unity: He is presented as having "Came to bring a new Day / Of harmony and unity" and "told us of the new way / That all men should live as one". Another song states, "In this Day Bahá’u’lláh / Talkin’ to the world about justice" and "about oneness".
  • Sufferer for Humanity: Children learn about his imprisonment and exile. For instance, he was "enchained and imprisoned Him / In a dungeon cold and black" and endured "banishment and exile" to "set us free". The song "The Shores of ‘Akká" recounts him as "The Peerless One" and "the prisoners called Him their Lord" enduring "great hardships" and "four and twenty years" in "the Most Great Prison".
  • Source of Peace and Love: He is called "The Prince of Peace" and is credited with bringing "love and peace of mind" and showing that "justice was best in His sight".
  • Personal Connection and Commitment: Children are encouraged to have a personal connection, as in "I have found Bahá’u’lláh / In the early days of my life / I will keep Him in my heart / And stay with Him forever". They are also asked, "Will you give your life to Bahá’u’lláh" and to "give your heart" to him.
  • Central Figure of a New Age: The songs herald his coming as the dawn of a "new Day" and a "new golden Age," fulfilling God's promises to mankind.

These classes are described as gatherings where children aged 5-12 learn spiritual qualities and virtues through stories, songs, games, and crafts!

But that's not the case. These children are brainwashed to believe that Baha'u'llah is superior to all other prophets and he is the manifestation of God for this age. While one of his "Tablet" explicitly states that he supplied women to his brother, Subḥ-i-Azal.

Specifically, Bahā’u’llāh recounts that after he and his brother arrived in Iraq, Subḥ-i-Azal sought a wife from him. Bahā’u’llāh states that he "procured for him what quelled his carnal desire, and he dwelled comfortably in the land". He further details that he "sent for believing women to be dispatched from other lands to appear before thee," after which his brother "didst enjoy intimacy with them and abide in conspicuous comfort". Bahā’u’llāh also mentions that his brother continued to seek gratification for his passion, eventually "gather[ing] around thyself a number of maidens and sustain[ing] thyself with them".

Source - Adib Masumian's website : https://adibmasumian.com/translations/lawh-i-mirza-rida-quli

Bahā’u’llāh thus Pimped out believing women to his brother and gave women from his cult to his brother.

More videos to see how Baha'is teach their religion to innocent children of other religions:

19 reasons to hate Baha'u'llah

  1. He hijacked the Báb’s movement.
    He dumped the rightful successor of the Báb and hijacked the whole movement for himself like a power-hungry opportunist.
  2. He was abusive, foul-mouthed, and dangerous.
    This guy was a narcissist and a compulsive liar with a God complex. He cursed people out, abused Muslims, and even ordered hits on those who challenged him like the Azalis.
  3. He lived like royalty but cried “prisoner.”
    While whining about being a “prisoner,” he lived in giant mansions with private gardens—one had around 30 rooms! Pure hypocrisy.
  4. He claimed to be God.
    He didn’t just claim divine inspiration—he straight-up said there is no God but him. Full-blown delusion.
  5. Failed family man with multiple wives.
    He married at least three times and completely failed at raising his kids. After he died, they went to war with each other—cursing and slandering like enemies.
  6. His family was a disaster.
    The so-called “holy family” was the most fractured, toxic, and disunited mess imaginable.
  7. Pretended to be Muslim his whole life.
    He kept up the act till the end—posing as a Muslim, performing Saum and Salah, and even getting buried the Muslim way. Fake to the core.
  8. Faked divine knowledge.
    He studied Arabic, trained with Sufis, and had a big personal library—but had the nerve to claim his knowledge was “innate” and “divine.” Give me a break.
  9. Ran away and left his family behind.
    When things got rough, he bailed. Fled to the mountains and left the women in his family to fend for themselves.
  10. His cult contributed nothing to the world.
    His entire so-called religion gave zero value to humanity. Just empty words and cultish nonsense.
  11. Started his movement after an erotic hallucination.
    He kicked off his “divine mission” after what sounds like a spiritualized wet dream about a “maiden of heaven.” Total creep vibes.
  12. Let people worship him.
    His followers bowed to him, walked around him like he was the Kaaba, and he just soaked it up like a wannabe god.
  13. Pimped out “believing women” to his brother.
    Yeah, he gave women from his cult to his brother. That’s not just twisted—it’s predatory.
  14. Wrote long-winded trash.
    His writings are bloated with over-the-top hype and barely any real meaning. All noise, no depth.
  15. Polluted a river with his garbage writings.
    He dumped thousands of his own writings into the Tigris River. People say the water actually changed color from the mess.
  16. Let people kiss his hands and feet.
    He acted like a king, letting followers kiss his hands and feet—then called them “servants of God.” What a joke.
  17. Claimed to be God but begged colonial powers for help.
    He preached he was divine, yet ran to imperialists and even The Times newspaper, begging for backup. So much for being all-powerful.
  18. Wrote a law book full of holes.
    His so-called “book of laws” is a contradictory mess—flawed, inconsistent, and practically unusable.
  19. Talked about religious unity while cursing everyone else.
    He preached unity, but anyone who didn’t worship him was called an infidel, a polytheist, or worse. Classic cult hypocrisy.